(15:46:14) <paolo> we also need to update the roadmap
(15:46:25) <paolo> do you guys have specific plans for 2.18?
(15:46:43) <nud_> well, I hope having more time than for 2.16
(15:47:15) <paolo> My plans are:
(15:47:27) <paolo> - redesigning the preferences dialog
(15:47:37) <nud_> bugs are 352914 and 352969
(15:47:40) <paolo> - find/grep plugin
(15:47:49) <paolo> - bug fixes
(15:48:57) <paolo> - add some advance editing features: like delete all line, select current line, reply last actions (like "." in vim)
(15:49:56) <paolo> we should ask to vim and emacs users which are the editing feature they use more frequently and see if we can implement them in gtksourcev
iew or gedit
(15:50:11) <nud_> yep
(15:51:12) <nud_> on my own I was planning to find ways to improve the plugin system, and rewriting external tools the way I wanted to do it for 2.16
(15:52:45) <pbor> I think we should have one and only one plan:
(15:52:47) <pbor> gsv2
(15:53:12) <pbor> we can't keep punting it
(15:53:17) <paolo> well, using gsv2 is an "implicit" goal for me
(15:53:19) <nud_> pbor: you can have a big plan and smaller objectives ;-)
(15:53:54) <nud_> anyway plans are made not to be completed
(15:54:05) <nud_> so maybe it's better not to have plans about gsv2
(15:54:06) *nud_ runs
(15:55:02) <paolo> BTW, we should also try to focus more on bug fixing
(15:58:46) <pbor> I'd like to kill the GnomeHistory widget
(15:59:07) <nud_> what is it ?
(15:59:18) <pbor> the one used in the find dialogs
(15:59:30) <nud_> oh
(15:59:42) <pbor> it's in libgnomeui & uses GtkCombo
(15:59:48) <pbor> deprecated^2
(15:59:53) <nud_> ok
(16:00:20) <pbor> and uses gnome-config as backend, so actually it's deprecated^3
(16:00:24) <pbor> :)
(16:00:24) <nud_> and we could have a common base widget to create a textcompletion widget for textview and entrys then
(16:02:10) <jessevdk> I want to work on version control support, snippets improvements and maybe a symbol browser plugin
(16:03:14) <nud_> symbol browser looks waaaaaay more interesting to me than version control atm
(16:03:39) <jessevdk> well it wasn't in order of importane
(16:04:05) <nud_> but it had the maybe keyword ;-)
(16:04:15) <jessevdk> I won't be able to do them both
(16:05:42) <jessevdk> the symbol browser would be interesting for a lot more users than version control
(16:09:00) <jessevdk> but it will take a lot of time and is probably a better candidate for gedit-plugins
(16:12:19) <paolo> yep, I don't think symbol browser fit in core
(16:12:30) <nud_> and scm does ?
(16:12:38) <paolo> probably not too
(16:12:59) <paolo> they are both developer oriented