*** You sign into welcome. 0:2:10 ? 0:2:10 then typed "_message hello world!" 0:2:10 it closed the link 0:2:10 any error? 0:2:10 Hello World! 15:52:30 okay, I can't send messages either. 15:55:26 the whole spec is horrifying, imo. 15:55:27 some one just sent me something :-P 15:55:32 i'm not here to provide a debug target 15:55:49 hehe, uh-oh 15:55:54 maylay: psyc://demented.no-ip.org/~fccbot ??? 15:56:3 Clunk, yup 15:56:13 maylay: Me 2 *** Lost route to «psyc://demented.no-ip.org/~fccbot» fccbot. 15:56:36 I'm sure I actually had "sending messages to channels" already welcome inspected on http://www.psyced.org/ coming from http://symlynx.com/opensource.en.html. 15:57:23 sheesh. the only thing giving psyconaut value seems to be gone. i cant see psyc traffic anymore. 15:57:50 bool areWeHavingFunYet() return false; 15:58:37 heh 15:58:59 it wouldn't be so bad if half the docs didn't describe a protocol that almost nobody uses 15:59:15 >> :_context psyc://psyced.org/@welcome 15:59:20 fff 15:59:53 http://pastebin.ca/2074729 16:0:26 coyo: that's an echo 16:0:32 it's what the server sends out, not what you send in *** knotty leaves welcome. 16:1:34 http://pastebin.ca/2074730 16:1:53 it's using commands i've never seen in doc 16:2:9 me neither 16:2:18 hmmm.. 16:2:32 'About 16 results (0.11 seconds) while searching for "_request_input"' 16:2:34 fuun 16:2:49 (on psyc.eu) 16:3:13 http://pastebin.ca/2074732 16:3:40 coyo: http://about.psyc.eu/Command 16:3:47 search for "issue a command using _request_input" 16:4:17 you know 16:4:20 the question occurs to me 16:4:27 if you're making a protocol based on exchanging packets 16:4:29 hmm? 16:4:30 that have a header 16:4:32 a command 16:4:33 and data 16:4:39 then WHY NOT JUST USE BLOODY HTTP ;___; 16:4:44 16:4:52 16:4:52 http can die? 16:4:59 16:5:0 http is well-tested and established 16:5:10 and, more importantly, already specced out. 16:5:21 almost as importantly* 16:5:26 i just want this client to work 16:5:35 the closest thing to a client is this 16:6:15 but yeah, you want _request_input apparently 16:6:25 it's technically in the docs, it's just not referenced by anything 16:6:25 16:7:7 16:7:19 16:10:4 16:10:10 16:10:13 coyo: to be fair 16:10:19 this is just psyc being misspecced. 16:10:27 it's not representative of the state of the web at large. 16:10:33 i know that. 16:10:37 kay. 16:10:40 16:10:54 16:11:27 16:12:17 http://pastebin.ca/2074736 16:12:45 aa, double noms 16:13:0 look at psyconaut output 16:13:4 that's a bug 16:13:5 this is a beta client 16:13:19 actions should not be signalled via _request_input 16:13:30 which tells you all you need to know about spec-first-implement-later 16:13:42 mmhmm 16:13:48 makes it easier on you though 16:13:52 just forget the spec and copy that :P 16:13:59 okay :3 16:14:2 i can fix it later