**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Nov 17 01:07:13 2006 [KingAnt has address n=mark@c-71-198-189-204.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] Nov 17 01:07:13 Alright **** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Nov 17 01:07:54 2006 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Nov 17 01:08:08 2006 [KingAnt has address n=mark@c-71-198-189-204.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] Nov 17 01:08:08 The Gaim development team does not have a consensus on support for voice and video Nov 17 01:08:15 Some of us want it, and some of us don't care Nov 17 01:08:28 It WILL get implemented at some point Nov 17 01:08:37 i dont see it happening anytime soon Nov 17 01:09:02 you all worry more about the menus, look of the interface Nov 17 01:09:06 and fixing lil minor bugs Nov 17 01:09:10 than actual features... Nov 17 01:09:38 should maybe open a new development branch for 3.0 Nov 17 01:09:48 and work on it with 2.0 at the same time Nov 17 01:09:51 sort of like firefox does Nov 17 01:09:51 I'd rather have something polished without voice and video support than something shitty that lets me talk to my friends for 20 seconds and then crashes Nov 17 01:10:02 why would it have to be shitty Nov 17 01:10:08 if you have developers polishing 2.0 Nov 17 01:10:12 Because lil minor bugs wouldn't be fixed? Nov 17 01:10:16 and ones that are implementing video voice in 3.0 Nov 17 01:10:23 then the polish can be migrated in with it Nov 17 01:10:32 You might be overestimating the size of the Gaim development team... Nov 17 01:10:38 i must be Nov 17 01:10:42 for an irc room that big though Nov 17 01:10:46 There aren't a lot of developers with free time Nov 17 01:10:48 you might think it has a good team Nov 17 01:11:04 The number of people in an irc channel is not a reflection on the size of the development team Nov 17 01:11:09 well im sure a lot of people would like to contribute but dont because they get knocked down on their ideas Nov 17 01:11:15 yes i know that Nov 17 01:11:18 Maybe Nov 17 01:11:31 But we don't knock down good patches Nov 17 01:11:31 what about other things Nov 17 01:11:46 like maybe fspot integration for photosharing via flickr on the yahoo protocol Nov 17 01:11:52 that shouldnt be hard to implement Nov 17 01:11:57 since its open source as well Nov 17 01:12:09 would that feature get pushed away if i requested it Nov 17 01:12:11 of course it would Nov 17 01:12:16 because its not sticking to the basics Nov 17 01:12:24 Holy shit have you seen how many open feature requests we have? Nov 17 01:12:25 if i was saying i was willing to help integrate that Nov 17 01:12:33 then i would be told to start a fork of the gaim project Nov 17 01:12:39 I wouldn't tell you that Nov 17 01:12:40 yes i have Nov 17 01:12:45 and just to be honest Nov 17 01:12:56 the sf bug/feature request thing is messy as hell Nov 17 01:13:01 Seriously, if you write a decent patch that adds a feature that it's retarded then we'll accept it Nov 17 01:13:14 We really don't have enough time to do what we want Nov 17 01:13:34 no but they make time to add silly shit to the about gaim dialog Nov 17 01:13:38 Like, I REALLY want to implement voice and video in Gaim, but I have an extremely small amount of free time Nov 17 01:14:17 Your perception of the Gaim development community is warped and I don't think you're willing to change your views, so I'm going to stop wasting my time talking to you Nov 17 01:14:29 no im not warped Nov 17 01:14:34 im just thinking outside the box Nov 17 01:14:56 and i know i could get a few people with plenty of time on their hands that know c and gtk Nov 17 01:14:57 but Nov 17 01:15:10 its getting along with the current development team that would be an issue Nov 17 01:15:19 nobody is going to want to work with people that arent open to new ideas **** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Nov 17 01:16:34 2006