/usr/bin/sh ./bench/run.sh B R L - C A D B E N C H M A R K ================================= Looking for the BRL-CAD raytracer ...found executable ./bench/../src/rt/rt Looking for a benchmark geometry directory ...found directory ./bench/../db Looking for a benchmark reference image directory ...found directory ./bench/../pix Looking for a benchmark reference log directory ...found directory ./bench/../pix Looking for a pixel comparison utility ...found executable ./bench/pixcmp Looking for a time elapsed utility ...found script ./bench/../sh/elapsed.sh Using [./bench/../src/rt/rt] for RT Using [./bench/../db] for DB Using [./bench/../pix] for PIX Using [./bench/../pix] for LOG Using [./bench/pixcmp] for CMP Using [./bench/../sh/elapsed.sh] for ELP Using [32] for TIMEFRAME Using [300] for MAXTIME Using [3] for DEVIATION Using [3] for AVERAGE RT reports the following version information: BRL-CAD Release 7.8.4 The BRL-CAD Raytracer RT BRL-CAD Release 7.8.4 The BRL-CAD Ray-Tracing Library BRL-CAD Release 7.8.4 The BRL-CAD Numerical Computation Library BRL-CAD Release 7.8.4 The BRL-CAD Utility Library Minimum run time is 3 minutes, 12 seconds Maximum run time is 30 minutes Estimated time is 9 minutes, 36 seconds Running the BRL-CAD Benchmark tests... please wait ... +++++ moss Frame 0: 357882 rays in 2.08 sec = 172224.25 rays/sec (RTFM) Frame 1: 715764 rays in 3.94 sec = 181758.25 rays/sec (RTFM) Frame 3: 2863056 rays in 15.41 sec = 185840.32 rays/sec (RTFM) Frame 4: 5726112 rays in 30.64 sec = 186877.45 rays/sec (RTFM) Frame 5: 11452224 rays in 60.89 sec = 188077.45 rays/sec (RTFM) pixcmp bytes: 786432 matching, 0 off by 1, 0 off by many moss.pix: answers are RIGHT +++++ world Frame 0: 486554 rays in 5.53 sec = 87968.54 rays/sec (RTFM) Frame 1: 973108 rays in 10.73 sec = 90648.16 rays/sec (RTFM) Frame 2: 1946216 rays in 21.22 sec = 91720.44 rays/sec (RTFM) Frame 3: 3892432 rays in 42.94 sec = 90652.38 rays/sec (RTFM) pixcmp bytes: 786432 matching, 0 off by 1, 0 off by many world.pix: answers are RIGHT +++++ star Frame 0: 312052 rays in 3.36 sec = 92872.62 rays/sec (RTFM) Frame 1: 624104 rays in 6.62 sec = 94204.38 rays/sec (RTFM) Frame 3: 2496416 rays in 26.08 sec = 95728.81 rays/sec (RTFM) Frame 4: 4992832 rays in 51.73 sec = 96509.68 rays/sec (RTFM) pixcmp bytes: 786432 matching, 0 off by 1, 0 off by many star.pix: answers are RIGHT +++++ bldg391 Frame 0: 375758 rays in 4.83 sec = 77828.91 rays/sec (RTFM) Frame 1: 751516 rays in 9.53 sec = 78841.38 rays/sec (RTFM) Frame 2: 1503032 rays in 19.06 sec = 78849.65 rays/sec (RTFM) Frame 3: 3006064 rays in 37.47 sec = 80228.03 rays/sec (RTFM) pixcmp bytes: 786432 matching, 0 off by 1, 0 off by many bldg391.pix: answers are RIGHT +++++ m35 Frame 0: 656360 rays in 6.72 sec = 97687.16 rays/sec (RTFM) Frame 1: 1312720 rays in 13.11 sec = 100138.84 rays/sec (RTFM) Frame 2: 2625440 rays in 25.81 sec = 101709.99 rays/sec (RTFM) Frame 3: 5250880 rays in 51.22 sec = 102518.21 rays/sec (RTFM) pixcmp bytes: 786358 matching, 74 off by 1, 0 off by many m35.pix: answers are RIGHT +++++ sphflake Frame 0: 1889266 rays in 17.75 sec = 106437.52 rays/sec (RTFM) Frame 1: 3778532 rays in 34.89 sec = 108298.42 rays/sec (RTFM) pixcmp bytes: 786432 matching, 0 off by 1, 0 off by many sphflake.pix: answers are RIGHT ... Done. Total testing time elapsed: 9 minutes, 14 seconds The following files have been generated and/or modified: *.log ..... final log files for each individual raytrace test *.pix ..... final pix image files for each individual raytrace test *.log.* ... log files for previous frames and raytrace tests *.pix.* ... pix image files for previous frames and raytrace tests summary ... performance results summary, 2 lines per run Summary: Abs FthrNtr 188077.45 90652.38 96509.68 80228.03 102518.2 1 108298.42 111047.36 Sun Mar 4 15:01:27 EST 2007 *vgr FthrNtr 1372.72 1351.81 1721.23 1503.52 1450.25 7.30 1234.47 #*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*# Benchmark results indicate an approximate VGR performance metric of 1234 Logarithmic VGR metric is 3.09 (natural logarithm is 7.12) #*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*# These numbers seem to indicate that this machine is approximately 1234 times faster than the reference machine being used for comparison, a VAX 11/780 running 4.3 BSD named VGR. These results are in fact approximately 3.09 orders of magnitude faster than the reference. Here are some other approximated VGR results for perspective: 120 on a 200MHz R5000 running IRIX 6.5 250 on a 500 MHz Pentium III running RedHat 7.1 550 on a dual 450 MHz UltraSPARC II running SunOS 5.8 1000 on a dual 500 MHz G4 PowerPC running Mac OS X 10.2 1500 on a dual 1.66 GHz Athlon MP 2000+ running RedHat 7.3 9000 on an 8 CPU 1.3 GHz Power4 running AIX 5.1 65000 on a 512 CPU 400 MHz R12000 Running IRIX 6.5 WARNING: This may not be an optimized compilation of BRL-CAD. Performance results may not be optimal. This appears to be a debug compilation of BRL-CAD. Official benchmark results are optimized builds with all run-time features enabled and optionally without compile-time debug symbols. For proper results, run 'make clean' and recompile with the following configure options added: --enable-optimized --disable-debug Read the benchmark.tr document for more details on the BRL-CAD Benchmark. The document is available at ./bench/../doc/benchmark.tr Benchmark testing complete. IriX64@FthrNtr ~/brlcad-7.8.4.old $