Consider that only today, you achieved the highest score on this maths test. You beat Andreas and tied with Lai-ying. You did brilliantly, and I gave you a hundred or so hugs, none of which probably meant anything to you.

Now, our education system is built around the bell curve. Absolutely every rank conforms to the bell curve, and exam results are no exception. If we were to take the standard deviation (I'm using the Niles definition) of the results on the test paper within our school this month, it would fit perfectly, suggesting the bell curve is occurring even on such a small sample size.

We know the standard deviation works because it has been tried and tested for years - even our career testing used it to demonstrate percentile rankings. It allocates results perfectly - it's kind of like scientists defecting to christianity because of the perfect nature of, well, nature.

When you achieved your mark on that test, you effectively fell into about the 96th percentile. 11 students took the test. (More accurately, the 90.9[r{09}] percentile). This would, in theory, place you towards the top end of the bell curve. The scores check out because we can run them through a standard deviation and get a bell curve.

The problem is when we bring in a cumulative distribution function. If we take (s^-p*(sqrt(n-1))+1), and run the results through a standard deviation we still get the bell curve - with one notable exception. This notable exception is your score. See, while everything else seems to come out perfectly (well, anything but perfectly considering how we all failed, but it still distributes properly), you return #NaN. Yes, your score doesn't compute.

Now, there is no reasonable explanation other than my three scientific calculation applications are totally broken. (Which isn't possible because one's from Microsoft, the other's from Google and the last is my own) Therefore, the only reasonable explanation is the use of supernatural methods to alter the cdf before your score was predetermined (yes, conspiracy) to enable an accurate result (actually, you do get a score out of the cdf, its just about 1.6E+90 above the others). Therefore, I can only assume that you are magical.