15:58 < persept> ~DWKnight: ping?
16:02 < DWKnight> spork
16:05 < persept> hey, i'm from the transmission channel, and i was wondering if i could talk to you about any concerns you had about the client
16:07 < persept> to clairify, the tracker announce time problem was fixed in this revision: http://transmission.m0k.org/trac/changeset/1149
16:08 < persept> and since releasing .7, many private trackers have unbanned us.  oink.me.uk for example
16:09 < persept> DWKnight: you there?
16:11 < persept> ~DWKnight
16:14 < DWKnight> I'm here
16:15 < persept> so did you have any questions, because the reason you stated for banning it has been fixed
16:15 < DWKnight> and unfortunately, the attitude I recieved in response to my original bug report is such that I won't be unbanning
16:16 < persept> how long ago was that?
16:16 < DWKnight> http://wiki.depthstrike.com/index.php/Tracker_Information:Banlist:Details:Transmission
16:16 < persept> ah yes i've read that
16:17 < persept> but you see, that was when there was no PEX in transmission, so the dev felt compeled to set a low announce time, and since PEX has been implimented, its been changed, though i don't quite agree to how he had it set up originally not obeying the tracker
16:17 < DWKnight> not having pex is no excuse
16:18 < DWKnight> clients were working fine without DHT or PEX for ages
16:18 < persept> yes i agree, but unfortunatly, titer was pretty stubborn
16:19 < DWKnight> it took someone equally as stubborn to raise the flag
16:19 < DWKnight> and his guarantee wasn't worth the bandwidth it took up
16:21 < persept> i just hope you would consider unbanning it based on the client itself as opposed to your impression of one of the dev's