2007-06-19T09:41:38  <nesl247> I'm locking posts that talk about it, because it's not going to happen, and I'm tired of the discussion.
2007-06-19T09:42:05  <cyberorg> nesl247: dont even think about locking anything
2007-06-19T09:42:15  <cyberorg> you would get fried alive :)
2007-06-19T09:42:36  <nesl247> I'm locking them. It's useless posting
2007-06-19T09:42:42  <nesl247> If they want to talk about it, post to the ml
2007-06-19T09:45:09  *** mvo_ has quit IRC
2007-06-19T09:52:20  <maniac103> nesl247: I wouldn't even THINK of censorship if you intend to be a serious admin+moderator
2007-06-19T09:52:37  <nesl247> maniac103: They should discuss it on the ml, where it's being discussed
2007-06-19T09:52:52  <nesl247> I'll post in the forum telling them that
2007-06-19T09:53:10  <cyberorg> nesl247: freedom also means freedom to discuss wherever user please
2007-06-19T09:53:19  <maniac103> cyberorg: exactly
2007-06-19T09:53:22  <nesl247> And we need to keep it in one place
2007-06-19T09:53:33  <nesl247> Besides, those threads were turning into flamewars
2007-06-19T09:53:36  <maniac103> nesl247: that's not true
2007-06-19T09:54:00  <SmSpillaz> Amaranth : ping
2007-06-19T09:54:01  <maniac103> topics should _only_ be locked if the people insult each other or do similar bad[TM] things
2007-06-19T09:54:08  <nesl247> Yes, they were turning into flamewars
2007-06-19T09:54:17  <maniac103> not if YOU don't like what they're talking about
2007-06-19T09:54:21  <maniac103> nesl247: link?
2007-06-19T09:54:27  <nesl247> http://forums.opencompositing.org/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=764
2007-06-19T09:54:36  <SmSpillaz> *reads the ML*
2007-06-19T09:54:39  *** mvo__ has quit IRC
2007-06-19T09:54:56  <nesl247> http://forums.opencompositing.org/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=746
2007-06-19T09:55:08  <nesl247> http://forums.opencompositing.org/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=799
2007-06-19T09:55:13  <nesl247>  - Only threads I locked
2007-06-19T09:55:23  <nesl247> All of which were bound to turn into flamewars
2007-06-19T09:56:04  <SmSpillaz> nesl247 : why are you so strongly against the subdomianing idea?
2007-06-19T09:56:09  <maniac103> you should at least put a note why you lock the thread
2007-06-19T09:56:18  <maniac103> and the 764 one isn't _so_ bad
2007-06-19T09:56:32  <SmSpillaz> nesl247: with the magic of DNS, we can redirect beryl.compiz.org to beryl.opencompositing.org
2007-06-19T09:57:21  <nesl247> There's no purpose for subdomain
2007-06-19T09:57:33  <maniac103> nesl247: and I would NOT have locked the 746 one
2007-06-19T09:57:46  <maniac103> Jeff and RYX are argueing, but that's ok IMO