[06:32] apokryphos: no [06:32] mornfall: is smart going to be used at all in kubuntu? [06:33] * apokryphos is interested on how exactly it'll be implemented to get biarch going [06:33] perhaps i should search the wiki :P [06:33] apokryphos: no :-) [06:33] * apokryphos listens [06:33] no for "used at all" [06:34] hrm yesterday at the Smart BOF they mentioned it will be used in edgy [06:34] * apokryphos is a little lost [06:35] edgy ubuntu [06:35] sure [06:35] aha, wiki, excellent [06:35] i'm not interested [06:35] mornfall: well that's what I'm talking about of course :) [06:35] so unless Riddell drops me, adept will continue the set course [06:35] apt is still to be *the* package manager in edgy [06:36] and hence so would adept 8) [06:36] it will stay that way for ever :] [06:36] probably [06:37] well [06:37] unless you volunteer to rewrite adept in python using smart [06:37] good luck with that :) [06:38] who was the person with the python-based notifier? :) [06:39] cool, https://wiki.kubuntu.org/SmartPackageManager has a lot of info [06:39] interesting, biarch compatibility isn't mentioned on there and I thought it was the main reason for using smart =) [06:39] where you got that idea? [06:40] there's at least apt-rpm that supports biarch [06:40] also [06:40] it should be noted that biarch is so useless [06:40] I know, but apt-rpm isn't great [06:40] noone cares :) [06:40] I got the idea from mark's original post to the mailing list [06:40] why is it useless? [06:40] and.........no, biarch isn't useless [06:40] whatever [06:40] it is [06:40] the ability to packaged install 32bit versions of software on a mainly 64bit system would be usefull to me numerous occasions now [06:40] care to enlighten us? [06:41] Lathiat: exactly [06:41] eventually, amd64 will unscrew theier architecture and it'll be useless again [06:41] --> OdyX has joined this channel (n=Didier@8.Red-80-33-64.staticIP.rima-tde.net). [06:41] hah [06:41] s/64// [06:41] mornfall: how so? [06:41] ok, sure [06:41] well, it's still useless for 95+% of cases [06:41] how is amd screwed the arch ? [06:41] so what? It still leaves that 5% which is very annoying at times [06:42] the 5% can live with chrooting [06:42] also its not just amd [06:42] hell no [06:42] iirc its usefull for sparc & powerpc too [06:42] * imbrandon loves his amd64 and to install 32bit userland apps would be great [06:42] chroot is hardly an alternative [06:42] ugh no chrotting is ugliest shit in the world [06:42] and is just a patch aroudn the fact the chroot can be installed on the overall system [06:42] it's much more elegant than biarch [06:42] really [06:42] = biarch! [06:42] yea ppc64 and ppc32 [06:42] :/ [06:43] and really, other distros had biarch quite some time ago. Ubuntu/Debian really need to catch up 8) [06:43] biarch means this ugly as shit workaround for not being able to have multiple versions of an so [06:43] lib64? for fucks sacke [06:43] so what? [06:43] it couldn't be more obivous special-case workaround [06:43] sake* [06:43] mornfall, chroot is a pita for 90% of people , this is a "user friendly" distro ;) [06:43] looks very nice and tidy to me [06:43] exactly [06:43] imbrandon: plain users don't mix 64b and 32b software [06:43] yes they do [06:44] firefox is a very popualr example [06:44] becaue flash etc arent 64bit [06:44] want flash to be able to work with flash+konqueror already? Not a problem [06:44] plsu there are a number of apps that fail to work properly on 64bit [06:44] mornfall, plain uses SHOULD use a 64bit kernel and all 32bit userland stuff with the EXCEPTION being 64bit userland [06:44] Lathiat: ahem -- proprietary software? i absolutely don't care [06:44] the netflow collector software i use at work for example [06:44] see a nice package for ubuntu but the user (as a lot) didn't package it for amd64? Again, not a problem [06:44] which is free software [06:44] wine etc too [06:44] mornfall: just because you dont care, doesnt mean no one else does [06:44] so you should rephrase your opinion to [06:45] "biach is useless to me" [06:45] :) [06:45] Lathiat: oh, it means that i won't implement it :) [06:45] also i lack the ability to spell [06:45] <-- Hobbsee has left this server (Connection timed out). [06:45] which in turn means unless someone else implements it, it won't exist [06:45] easy : [06:45] :-) [06:45] ubuntu said it'd be implemented through smart, anyhow [06:46] feel free to rewrite all apt-based software [06:46] noone is stopping you, really [06:46] --> Hobbsee has joined this channel (n=Hobbsee@ubuntu/member/hobbsee). [06:46] some people are working on the problems [06:46] (see the wiki page) [06:46] well, that includes adept [06:46] well id ont know aythign about smart [06:46] jdub & co. [06:46] i thought it was being worked on to make it work in apt? [06:46] hahaha, jdub [06:46] great [06:47] Lathiat: it's a very nice package manager :) [06:47] and dpkg [06:47] Lathiat: it works with apt just fine [06:47] hi again all [06:47] wb Hobbsee [06:47] wb Hobbsee [06:47] thanks, what'd i miss? [06:47] * Hobbsee had everything freeze. [06:47] Hobbsee: small flamewar [06:47] Hobbsee: discussing the credibility of biarch/smart [06:47] Hobbsee: bickering abotyu biarch :) [06:48] see, the real-world usecases for biarch are limited to proprietary software? come on [06:48] oh darn! flamewars are fun! [06:48] you don't seriously think i should devote one hour to that [06:48] ...to read and laugh at [06:48] mornfall: no, they're not. See the other example I gave. [06:48] no its not, it is however, a use [06:48] *** OdyX is now known as OdyXydO. [06:48] and wine is also 32bit [06:48] and one that is important to other people, unfortunately