20:23:33 < proyvind> herton: I made an updated binutils package, but acls has been reintroduced for toolchain, so I'm unable to commit, others was sceptic towards new
                     version during beta stage of distro (IMO new binutils version doesn't contain enough changes etc. for it to be a problem during beta though..)..
20:23:55 < proyvind> WDYT? current binutils package hasn't been updated since june..
20:26:28 < herton> proyvind: don't know much about newer binutils, but would be good to update
20:27:16 < herton> proyvind: see with pixel what he thinks about, and with ennael too to allow you to submit it
20:27:17 < proyvind> updated package with changelog is available on n4:~peroyvind/svn/binutils with changelog in file
20:27:23 < |Frederik> I think this one is already two months in Fedora Rawhide, so it should be fine. I guess they can test it much better than we ever can, as they
                      support much more architectures
20:28:32 < herton> if it's on Fedora already great, already had some good testing, the I think shouldn't have any bug surprises
20:28:47 < herton> sp
20:28:51 < herton> er
20:29:01 < herton> :)
20:29:16 < lcapitulino> proyvind: did you rediff all the patches?
20:29:22 < proyvind> lcapitulino: yes
20:30:05 < proyvind> rediffed, dropped the ones to drop, synced the ones to sync with fedora etc. :)
20:30:23 < |Frederik> It's this one, no? : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=27856