[10:13] [INFO] Query view for “Zibri” opened. temp_file_exists() take a look it returns true on count=1 and never goes through the rest of it .. are you crazy or what ? ziphone -C executes that and works perfectly line 345, temp_file_exists the MD5 check is useless no time now but thanks for pointing out take care seriously, that could brick a phone fyi, a dev team guy pointed it out, I just don't want any phones bricked please. stop saying bullshits ok ? go to dev team dude, look at the code? namaste it returns true on ONE BYTE yep get the latest code it's on svn and dev team are STUPID go to www.ziphone.org click on download I gotta disagree with that at the bottom of the page there is SOURCE click there OK bye sorry i'm in a rush it's still broken temp_file_exists check it, you need to use a bool flag http://code.google.com/p/iphone-elite/source/browse/trunk/ZiPhone/ziphone.cpp lol i know the url yeah so look at bool temp_file_exists and then look inside the for (count=0; count < 16 loop and look at how it will always return on the first cycle of the loop no time now.. really.. write here what you THINK it's the problem THERE is no problem if a ramdisk is wrong. the problem is that the MD5 check will only ever check on count=0 and then it returns people have to get the archive from my site anyways and almost everyone (dev team included) downloaded it. look at the code!! you should just take out the damn for loop and set count=0 b eforehand, it'll do the same thing and used it. well the dev team just pointed that out to me, line 378 is your problem uh right ok but it's not a real one did you not write this code? is this why you can't understand what I'm saying? THANKS for pointing out i am not angry at you at all dude, look at line 378, it will return true on count=0 and not iterate i can good, I'm not worried about people getting angry, I'm worried about a bad ramdisk brickin' a phone after the first round the variable is still 17 i know no risk to brick a phone ramdisk does it all return true; <--- that exits the function on count=0 ziphone is like iphuc yep already corrected a typo :) now a question it's still broken on code.google.com do you want to help here or prefer hackint0sh ? well, I don't really see your site sticking around, Apple is going to patch the ziPhone exploit in 1.1.4/1.2 and then you're not gonna be able to do anything with ziPhone so really the future is hackint0sh, even though now might be on ziPhone ok.. then bye bye! please correct that code