Session Start: Sat Mar 15 11:28:01 2008
Session Ident: WhatMan
00[11:28:01] •››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››› ››››› ››› ›› ›› ›› › ›
00[11:28:01] ::: Query with (WhatMan)/(whatman@what.cd) opened on (Saturday, March 15th 2008, 11:28:01).
00[11:28:01] ::: Total queries: (191)/(~1.6 per day)
00[11:28:01] ::: Queries today: (1)
00[11:28:01] ::: Common channels: (what.cd-help ~#what.cd-disabled ~#what.cd ~#admin)
00[11:28:01] •››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››› ››››› ››› ›› ›› ›› › ›
00[11:28:56] [MattieTK]: bit pissed off actually
[11:29:04] [WhatMan]: How come?
00[11:29:07] [MattieTK]: incase you didn't have logs or haven't been filled in from last night
[11:29:15] [WhatMan]: I don't.
[11:29:17] [WhatMan]: And haven't.
00[11:29:30] [MattieTK]: sec
00[11:29:38] [MattieTK]: it's just about people getting "second chances" all the time
[11:30:08] [WhatMan]: Weren't you the one who was advocating second chances?
00[11:30:27] [MattieTK]: not of people like this
00[11:31:28] [MattieTK]: basicly, at the moment, despite ratio requirements being in place for 2 more weeks now
00[11:31:35] [MattieTK]: i'm afraid of disabling people becuase of it
00[11:32:02] [MattieTK]: becuase i know that i won't be there to handle their case, and they'll get enabled, or i'll get a beating for disabling someone with 0.09 ratio at 5.01GB down
00[11:32:28] [MattieTK]: logicaluser enabled someone who has 15GB down and less than 500GB up
00[11:32:30] [MattieTK]: for a second chance
[11:32:44] [WhatMan]: 500MB, I assume you mean.
00[11:32:45] [MattieTK]: the guy was leeching/partial seeding one file
00[11:32:47] [MattieTK]: yes
00[11:32:48] [MattieTK]: sorry
00[11:33:12] [MattieTK]: so i dissabled him again, becuase i'm so sick of my decisions being overturned becuase they're ratio related disables
00[11:33:22] [MattieTK]: and for some reason they're allowed to be
00[11:33:39] [MattieTK]: and some one liek that should never be enabled, i don't care about their excuse
00[11:33:49] [MattieTK]: they got themselves into that situation somehow
[11:34:49] [WhatMan]: Did you interview the guy?
00[11:34:50] [MattieTK]: and firstly qMark told me again that i shouldnt be overturning other moderator's decisions, which i fine, but logicaluser technically overturned mine, and i'm only disabling the extreme abusers atm
00[11:35:05] [MattieTK]: no, logicaluser would have done
[11:35:17] [WhatMan]: Maybe he was an i-doser noob.
[11:35:26] [WhatMan]: On oink, these people got second chances as well.
00[11:35:29] [MattieTK]: but i wouldnt have even got to that point, we shouldn't have to interview everyone and hear them make up a astory about how their nan got their account
00[11:35:43] [MattieTK]: the torrents are clearly labelled
00[11:35:49] [MattieTK]: i did it as my first action as staff
00[11:35:59] [MattieTK]: if they cannot read, they don't deserve their accounts
00[11:36:22] ::: (azc) highlighted you in (#underground): !compare azc MattieTK
00[11:36:23] ::: (athrerBot) highlighted you in (#underground): Compatibility for: azc <=> MattieTK Score: low (6.42%)
[11:36:52] [WhatMan]: Well, it's certainly a point of view. But if they keep leeching, they're going to get disabled anyways.
[11:37:04] [WhatMan]: And LogicalUser adds these people to his friends list so he can watch them.
[11:37:07] [WhatMan]: As far as I know.
00[11:38:57] [MattieTK]: well i'm no longer disabling people for ratio if they're not going to be seen by me
00[11:39:05] [MattieTK]: and get seen by one of the softmods who enables everyone they see
00[11:39:43] [MattieTK]: especially when qmark implied last night that the rules can be broken freely, becuase everyone deserves a second chance
00[11:40:30] ::: Nick: (WhatMan) is now known as (WhereMan)
00[11:58:06] ::: Nick: (WhereMan) is now known as (WhatMan)
Session Close: Sat Mar 15 12:06:17 2008
Session Start: Sat Mar 15 12:21:15 2008
Session Ident: WhatMan
00[12:21:15] •››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››› ››››› ››› ›› ›› ›› › ›
00[12:21:15] ::: Query with (WhatMan)/(whatman@what.cd) opened on (Saturday, March 15th 2008, 12:21:15).
00[12:21:15] ::: Total queries: (193)/(~1.6 per day)
00[12:21:15] ::: Queries today: (3)
00[12:21:15] ::: Common channels: (~#what.cd)
00[12:21:15] •››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››››› ››››› ››› ›› ›› ›› › ›
[12:21:15] <WhatMan> hi.
00[12:21:25] [MattieTK]: don't need that anymore
00[12:21:28] : MattieTK turns off
[12:21:31] [WhatMan]: Haha
00[12:21:36] [MattieTK]: hilarious
[12:21:50] [WhatMan]: Okay, I was going to do a lengthy explanation, but you noticed before I'd gotten everything planned.
00[12:22:02] [MattieTK]: how ironic that i was busy moderating
[12:22:20] [WhatMan]: Basically, we learned a few hours ago that people are still getting information about what goes on in #admin from you.
[12:22:37] [WhatMan]: I'm not going to talk about names or circumstances, but that's how it went.
[12:22:48] [WhatMan]: So we had to make a snap decision.
[12:23:13] [WhatMan]: Since we'd already talked to you about this, this was the only step we could take.
00[12:23:14] [MattieTK]: if you didn't have just overzealoius adminsitrators i wouldn't feel the need to vent
00[12:23:32] [MattieTK]: have felt*
[12:24:22] [WhatMan]: Are you talking about qMark?
00[12:24:27] ::: (RoBz) highlighted you in (#waffles.fm-help) on (P2P-NET): So, Mattie you're moving over to waffles now?
00[12:24:41] [MattieTK]: of coruse i'm talking about qmark, though dblaze should never have been promoted either
[12:25:20] [WhatMan]: What's your beef with qMark?
[12:25:33] [WhatMan]: He's honestly one of the three staff members I've never seen seriously fuck up.
00[12:26:00] [MattieTK]: nevermind
00[12:26:02] [MattieTK]: i could go on and on
00[12:26:06] [MattieTK]: but it would be my opinion
00[12:26:09] [MattieTK]: and it would mean fuck all
00[12:26:11] [MattieTK]: especially now
[12:26:50] [WhatMan]: Well, I want you to know that this demotion wasn't a personal thing - it was simply to protect us from an obvious information leakage.
00[12:27:01] [MattieTK]: from the person who did it
00[12:27:04] [MattieTK]: i see it as personal
00[12:27:13] [MattieTK]: qmark has never sided with a single word i've ever said
[12:27:20] [WhatMan]: I was the one who removed your IRC access.
00[12:27:46] [MattieTK]: i dod most of that myself after i saw 71PMs
00[12:27:51] [MattieTK]: and one which didnt seem to appear at the top
00[12:28:00] [MattieTK]: franticly freshsing to try and find a user requiring my help
00[12:28:09] [MattieTK]: oh, no, it's from 431 weeks ago
[12:29:10] [WhatMan]: It was my decision, and it wasn't a personal thing.
[12:29:22] [WhatMan]: qMark just does my bidding.
00[12:29:26] [MattieTK]: there's nothing you can say to make me believe that
00[12:29:33] [MattieTK]: qMark manipulates everyone to do his bidding
00[12:29:41] [MattieTK]: everyone but me
00[12:29:46] [MattieTK]: that's why i had to be gotten rid of
[12:30:15] [WhatMan]: I was the one who brought it up. Really.
00[12:30:29] [MattieTK]: [12:29:26] [MattieTK]: there's nothing you can say to make me believe that
[12:30:49] [WhatMan]: Alright, suit yourself. I have to go make dinner, and I'm not going to spend hours trying to convince you.
00[12:30:54] [MattieTK]: get your rules sorted out
00[12:31:01] [MattieTK]: get a staff team that doesnt fight
00[12:31:05] [MattieTK]: then gazelle might work
00[12:31:11] [MattieTK]: suppose you've just sorted #2
[12:31:20] [WhatMan]: Pretty much.
07[12:31:34] [WhatMan]: Good luck in everything, Mattie.
00[12:31:49] [MattieTK]: you too, nice job getting rid of the seedbox just on time
00[12:31:58] [MattieTK]: wonder if they'd still believe me
[12:32:11] [WhatMan]: Meh. It expired and no one ever used it for what it was intended for.
[12:32:20] [WhatMan]: So it went bye bye.
00[12:32:40] [MattieTK]: thanks for those 2 lines
00[12:34:00] ::: Nick: (WhatMan) is now known as (WhereMan)