At 15:50 the verdict came in the case of Istorrent vs Smáís (Icelandic MPAA). The Smáís organization is going to appeal the case to the Supreme court and the restraint of using the torrent.is url as a tracker is still in effect. The reasons for the dismissal were based on the electronic business & other electronic services laws passed 2002. The verdict explains: "In the general comments about the bill that was passed 2002 it is stated that a service which does not collect any payment from a consumer can fall under the concept [of a business], since it does entail a business endeavour. In that way a service that offers ad-endorsed information gathering can as well fall under the concept. As well as a service that entails data searching or making data accessible can be considered an electronic service, even if the party who asks for the access/search does not pay for said service." The court sees Torrent.is as such a service. A while later in the verdict: "The definition of a client, according to the law, is a person or a firm that with a commercial or other purpose uses an electronic service but the service provider is a person or firm that gives electronic service". "In the verdict it says that the case is considered faulty because neither parties discussed the meaning of the digital(not sure) laws in this case and that it's not the court's place to do so independently"