<@Didactylos> PovAddict: World Community Grid plan on having their own wiki for project specific stuff. I think it would be great if all major projects could do the same. <@Didactylos> However, I realise that isn't practical for small projects. I think it would be better if projects added official content to a single wiki <@Didactylos> As for what David will do.... try it and see :-) <@Didactylos> PovAddict: projects are autonomous. That's the thing that really seemed to annoy Paul, but it's very important from an open source perspective. I agree with having them autonomous but, according to that big thread on SETI, admins everywhere are so busy with maintaining the project that they don't have time to talk to users; imagine if they would have time to setup wiki software *and* add content to it! <@Didactylos> Indeed. <@Didactylos> I would be most in favour of repurposing UBW specifically for project documentation, for those that want it - with lots of interwiki back to official BOINC documentation. <@Didactylos> That's my best case scenario. <@Didactylos> I expect the official WCG wiki to be similarly heavy on the interwiki. <@Didactylos> I'm not going to stop anyone using the official BOINC wiki for project stuff (although DA might). I think it's a bad idea, though.